Skip to content

The Re-Trade Dilemma: Bait, Switch, or Justified?

In the intricate landscape of mergers and acquisitions, few moves invoke as much concern as the “retrade”. As the market’s volatility grows and buyer investigations become more rigorous, the phenomenon of re-trades warrants a deeper look.

As mergers and acquisitions remain a complex terrain, the retradeoften viewed as a post-agreement curveballcan introduce unforeseen challenges for both buyers and sellers. But what prompts such renegotiations, and how can sellers adeptly navigate this labyrinth to safeguard their interests?

In this analysis, we will explore the underpinnings of re-trades, distinguish between genuine concerns and tactical plays, and offer sellers a comprehensive roadmap to not only weather the re-trade storm but also to master the dance of deal-making. Join us as we dissect this M&A quandary.

Understanding the Re-Trade Dilemma

In essence, a re-trade is a renegotiation that happens after the initial agreement is set. This can be a source of friction between both parties:

  • Seller’s Perspective: “This new valuation and structure are not what we initially agreed upon!”
  • Buyer’s Perspective: “Had I been privy to all the data beforehand, my initial offer would have been different.”

This tug-of-war of perspectives is often the crux of the issue. Both sides may feel justified, but understanding the underlying causes is vital.

Decoding the Reasons for Re-Trades

Re-trades can stem from genuine discoveries or be a tactical move:

Justifiable Alterations:

  • Financial Discoveries: Unearthing discrepancies in finances not initially apparent.
  • Operational Risks: Identification of risks that might have been previously overlooked.
  • Industry Shifts: Changes in the broader industry that impact the valuation.
  • Financing Challenges: Unexpected obstacles in securing the necessary finances.

Tactical Negotiations:

  • Some buyers, upon gaining exclusivity, may utilize newfound information (or the claim of such) as leverage to push for a lower price, especially if they sense the seller is eager or inexperienced.

Shielding Against the Re-Trade Storm: Best Practices for Sellers

To minimize the likelihood and impact of re-trades, sellers can adopt a few strategies:

  • Commit to Transparency: By being upfront about every aspect of the business, sellers eliminate the “surprise” factor. A known weakness, when declared and positioned correctly, can’t be used as a renegotiation tactic.
  • Conduct a Robust Quality of Earnings Report: Engaging a top-tier accounting firm to provide a detailed Quality of Earnings (QoE) report can unearth and address valuation drivers including EBITDA normalizations, margin and growth trends, and capital trends.
  • Thoroughly Vet Your Buyer: Familiarize yourself with the buyer’s history. Are re-trades a common tactic for them? What’s their track record in your industry?
  • Dive Deep into Valuation Metrics: Understand the bedrock of the valuation. Are they basing it on past EBITDA, growth rates, or some other metric? This helps in aligning expectations
  • Keep Projections Grounded: Over-optimistic projections that aren’t met can be a primary trigger for re-trades. Aim for realistic projections and strive to surpass them.
  • Maximize Negotiation Leverage: Often, sellers get too caught up in valuation and overlook other crucial aspects of the deal like transition plans, integration strategies, and the impact on employees. These should be negotiated when the seller has the most leverage.

Navigating Re-Trade Scenarios: Options for Sellers

If confronted with a re-trade, sellers aren’t without recourse:

  • Restructure the Deal: Alter the terms to keep the valuation intact, like introducing future contingent payments.
  • Address and Re-Engage: If the re-trade stems from a solvable issue, address it and then revisit negotiations with the buyer.
  • Seek Alternate Buyers: If the current buyer’s terms become unfavorable, considering other bids might be a prudent move.
  • Consider Pulling Out: If the renegotiated terms don’t align with the seller’s objectives and there’s skepticism about achieving better with other bidders, walking away, though tough, might be the best course.

In the challenging world of M&A, surprises are inevitable, but with foresight and strategic planning, they can be managed. While the prospect of re-trades can be daunting, with a clear strategy and an eye on the end goal, sellers can navigate these waters with confidence.

Dive into the Re-Trade Riddle: Decoded!

In the intricate ballet of mergers and acquisitions, the unpredictability of re-trades can introduce a tense interlude. Such interruptions can test the resolve of sellers, challenge the patience of buyers, and redefine the very essence of pre-agreed terms.

But like any formidable challenge in the world of business, it’s not about the disruption, but rather how one responds. At the crossroads of preparation and opportunity, there’s a path to navigating these challenges with grace and efficacy.

Navigating M&A, especially when facing potential re-trades, requires knowledge, strategy, and experience. At Astria Group, we’re dedicated to guiding businesses and their leaders through every twist and turn. Ready to ensure your next transaction is smooth and in your favor? Reach out to Astria today.

Ready to sell your business successfully?

Download our Ultimate Guide to Choosing an M&A Advisor now and learn how to prepare your business, find the right advisor, negotiate a favorable deal, manage the closing process, and more. Simply enter your name and email below to get started.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Astria LLC